LogoBotmonster Tech
AI Smart Home Self-Hosting Coding Web Dev Hardware Bootpag Image2SVG Tags

Security

  • ◀︎
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • ▶︎
Docker Image Hardening: Minimal Bases, Non-Root, and Trivy Scans

Docker Image Hardening: Minimal Bases, Non-Root, and Trivy Scans

Hardening a Docker image means cutting the attack surface at every layer. Start from a minimal base like distroless or Alpine. Run as a non-root user. Set the filesystem read-only. Drop all Linux capabilities and add back only what the app needs. Pin dependency versions with checksums. Scan images with Trivy or Grype before you push. Each layer of this checklist stands on its own, so you can adopt them one at a time.

Vibe Coding Security Crisis: 2,000 Vulnerabilities Found in 5,600 AI-Built Apps

Vibe Coding Security Crisis: 2,000 Vulnerabilities Found in 5,600 AI-Built Apps

The numbers are in, and they’re bad. Escape.tech scanned 5,600 vibe-coded apps in the wild. It found over 2,000 bugs, more than 400 exposed secrets, and 175 leaks of personal data, including medical records and IBANs. A separate December 2025 audit by Tenzai found 69 flaws across just 15 test apps built with five popular AI coding tools. Georgia Tech’s Vibe Security Radar tracked CVEs caused by AI-generated code. They climbed from 6 in January 2026 to 35+ by March. The incidents aren’t hypothetical now. They’re outages, leaked databases, and wiped customer records.

AI Coding Agents Are Insider Threats: Prompt Injection, MCP Exploits, and Supply Chain Attacks

AI Coding Agents Are Insider Threats: Prompt Injection, MCP Exploits, and Supply Chain Attacks

Your AI coding agent has the same file access, shell rights, and database keys you do. A review of 78 studies from January 2026 (arXiv:2601.17548 ) tested every big coding agent. The list ran every major agentic coding assistant . All fell to prompt injection. Adaptive attacks landed more than 85% of the time. This isn’t theory. CVE-2026-23744 gave attackers remote code execution on MCPJam Inspector at CVSS 9.8. A booby-trapped PDF tripped a physical pump through a Claude MCP link at a plant. Attackers hit GitHub’s MCP server to exfiltrate private repository data via malicious issues . And 47 firms fell to a poisoned plugin ecosystem that hid for six months.

Claude Code Is Built Entirely on MCP - What the Source Leak Revealed

Claude Code Is Built Entirely on MCP - What the Source Leak Revealed

Claude Code doesn’t use MCP as a plugin system. It is MCP. On March 31, 2026, Anthropic shipped a 59.8 MB source map by accident in npm package @anthropic-ai/claude-code v2.1.88. Developers got a rare look at how a real AI coding agent works. Every capability in Claude Code (file reads, bash, web fetches, Computer Use, IDE bridges) runs as a single permission-gated MCP tool call. There is no special internal API. Third-party MCP servers you connect get the same execution path, permission checks, and error handling as Anthropic’s own built-in tools.

The Claude Code Source Leak: What 512,000 Lines of TypeScript Revealed About AI Agent Architecture

The Claude Code Source Leak: What 512,000 Lines of TypeScript Revealed About AI Agent Architecture

One missing line in a build config caused the worst source leak in AI tooling history. On March 31, 2026, Anthropic shipped version 2.1.88 of its @anthropic-ai/claude-code package with a 59.8 MB JavaScript source map inside. That map held the full client agent harness for Claude Code : 512,000 lines of readable TypeScript in 1,906 files. Mirrors of the code spread thousands of times in hours. A clean-room Python/Rust rewrite then became the fastest-growing repo in GitHub history. Anthropic’s legal response hit the wrong targets. The day got worse: a supply-chain attack hit the axios npm package, piling on for devs who rely on these tools.

Build a Portable Hacking Lab with a Raspberry Pi 5

Build a Portable Hacking Lab with a Raspberry Pi 5

You can build a self-contained pen testing lab on a Raspberry Pi 5 running Kali Linux ARM64. Add a battery HAT, a 7-inch display, and a wireless adapter that does packet injection. Total cost lands between $200 and $250. The result is a pocket-sized hacking kit that runs Nmap, Burp Suite, Wireshark, Aircrack-ng, and Metasploit in the field, at CTF events, or on jobs where you can’t lug a laptop.

  • ◀︎
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • ▶︎

Most Popular

Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3.5 vs Llama 4: Which Open Model Should You Actually Use? (2026)

Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3.5 vs Llama 4: Which Open Model Should You Actually Use? (2026)

Gemma 4, Qwen 3.5, and Llama 4 compared on benchmarks, licensing, speed, and hardware so you can pick the right open model fast.

5 Open Source Repos That Make Claude Code Unstoppable

5 Open Source Repos That Make Claude Code Unstoppable

Five March 2026 repos extend Claude Code with autonomous ML, self-healing skills, GUI automation, multi-agent coordination, and Google Workspace access.

Cross-section of a translucent crystal brain threaded by red, gold, and teal attention ribbons resting on a doubly-stochastic matrix pedestal beside a guitar-tuning lab figure.

DeepSeek V4 Tech Report: 3 Tricks That Cut Compute 73%

DeepSeek V4 ships 1.6T parameters and 1M context using only 27% of V3.2's inference FLOPs. Inside the hybrid attention, mHC residuals, and Muon optimizer.

Cracked stone tablet engraved with a bulleted system prompt, four crossed-out goblin silhouettes repeated, a tiny goblin escaping with upvote-arrow sparks, a giant dollar-sign price tag, and figures refusing to step onto a glossier pedestal.

GPT 5.5 Reddit Reception: Goblins and the Cost Backlash

GPT-5.5 Reddit reception: viral goblin prompt leak, doubled pricing backlash, and 5.4 holdouts citing hallucination regressions in factual recall workflows.

What X and Reddit Users Are Saying about Claude Opus 4.7

What X and Reddit Users Are Saying about Claude Opus 4.7

How power users on X and Reddit reacted to Claude Opus 4.7: praise for agentic coding, token burn concerns, and teams' practical prompting habits.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Alibaba's Open-Weight Coding MoE

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Alibaba's Open-Weight Coding MoE

Alibaba's sparse Mixture-of-Experts: 35B total parameters, 3B active per token. Q4 quantization runs on MacBook Pro M5, matches Claude Sonnet performance.

Alacritty vs. Kitty: Best High-Performance Linux Terminal

Alacritty vs. Kitty: Best High-Performance Linux Terminal

Alacritty vs Kitty in 2026: emoji and Unicode rendering, real benchmarks, latency, memory, maintainer reputation, and the right terminal for your workflow.

Like what you read?

Get new posts on Linux, AI, and self-hosting delivered to your inbox weekly.

Privacy Policy  ·  Terms of Service
2026 Botmonster