LogoBotmonster Tech
AI Smart Home Self-Hosting Coding Web Dev Hardware Bootpag Image2SVG Tags

AI

Hands-on guides to LLMs, agents, prompt engineering, and the AI tools I run every day for real work, not demos.

  • ◀︎
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 16
  • ▶︎
A lightning-bolt-shaped racing vehicle speeds across a landscape of terminal windows while small subagents fan out and a rocket waits on a launchpad.

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 76% on Terminal-Bench, 4x Faster Output

Google released Gemini 3.5 Flash on May 19, 2026. The fast, lower-cost tier scored 76.2% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and, by Google’s own measure, generates output about 4 times faster than other frontier models. Flash is available today across the Gemini app, Search, and the API. Gemini 3.5 Pro is confirmed for next month.

Key Takeaways

  • Gemini 3.5 Flash launched on May 19, 2026 and is free to use in the Gemini app and Google Search.
  • It scored 76.2% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, a test of finishing real terminal tasks end to end.
  • Google says Flash produces output about 4 times faster than rival frontier models.
  • The model is built for agents that run long, multi-step jobs and call tools.
  • Gemini 3.5 Pro, the larger sibling, is confirmed for next month.

What is Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google’s new fast, lower-cost tier of the Gemini 3.5 family. It was announced and made generally available on May 19, 2026, according to the Google announcement post . The “Flash” name has always meant a model tuned for speed and price.

Two identical metal engine blocks on a workbench, the second one fed by funnels of code fragments and tuned by a robotic precision arm.

Cursor Composer 2.5 vs Composer 2: What Actually Changed

Cursor Composer 2.5 is an incremental upgrade over Composer 2, not a new model. Both run on Moonshot’s open-source Kimi K2.5 checkpoint, so the entire difference is training. Composer 2.5 learned from 25x more synthetic coding tasks plus targeted reinforcement learning. Standard pricing holds at $0.50 per million input tokens.

Key Takeaways

  • Composer 2.5 and Composer 2 share the same open-source base model, so only the training changed.
  • Cursor trained Composer 2.5 on 25 times more synthetic coding tasks than the older version.
  • The standard model costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens.
  • A faster variant exists for $3.00 input and $15.00 output per million tokens.
  • Cursor is now building a much larger coding model from scratch with 10x more compute.

What is Cursor Composer 2.5?

Composer 2.5 is Cursor’s in-house coding model and the direct successor to Composer 2. It runs inside the Cursor editor, which slots into a crowded field of AI coding tools . The model is built for sustained work, not just quick one-shot answers.

Blender MCP: Control Blender With Claude AI Through Natural Language

Blender MCP: Control Blender With Claude AI Through Natural Language

Siddhartha Ahuja’s Blender MCP is the open-source project that puts Claude at the Blender keyboard. A Model Context Protocol server talks to a Blender add-on over a TCP socket on port 9876. From there, Claude can build shapes, paint materials, read the scene, pull free assets from Poly Haven , make meshes through Hyper3D Rodin , import Sketchfab models, and run any Python inside Blender. The repo has 19,694 stars, an MIT license, and sits at version 1.5.5. Similar add-ons exist for Unreal, Godot, Maya, and Figma. This one has the biggest crowd and the deepest tool list by far.

Claude Agent SDK: Build Custom AI Agents Without Reinventing the Orchestration Layer

Claude Agent SDK: Build Custom AI Agents Without Reinventing the Orchestration Layer

The Claude Agent SDK is the Claude Code engine stripped down to a library. Same agent loop, same built-in tools, same context handling, but you call it from your own Python or TypeScript code instead of the CLI. If you’ve used Claude Code to read files, run shell commands, search codebases, and edit code, the SDK points that same machinery at any problem you want. No human needs to sit in the loop.

Claude Code for Data Analysis: Process 500K Rows Without Writing Code

Claude Code for Data Analysis: Process 500K Rows Without Writing Code

Yes, you can point Claude Code at a 541,909-row retail dataset and walk away with a six-sheet Excel workbook, professional charts, and a parameterized report script, without opening a Python file or debugging a single line of code. The complete workflow takes roughly 15 to 20 minutes from raw data to finished output.

The goal is real delegation. Claude handles setup, cleaning, math, and charts. You focus on the right questions to ask.

Claude Code in CI/CD: Automate PR Reviews and Issue Fixes with GitHub Actions

Claude Code in CI/CD: Automate PR Reviews and Issue Fixes with GitHub Actions

Anthropic ships claude-code-action , an official GitHub Action that runs the full Claude Code runtime inside your CI/CD pipeline. It reviews pull requests, builds features from issues when someone types @claude, writes tests, updates docs, and drafts release notes. It also respects your repo’s CLAUDE.md coding rules. The runtime runs on a GitHub Actions runner, with tool use, file reads, and multi-step reasoning.

It ships with four auth backends: Anthropic API, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry. It also has a sister claude-code-security-review action for vuln scans, native GitLab CI/CD support, and real deployments. Deriv runs it across 700+ repos, handling 100+ PRs per week. So this has moved past the demo stage. Teams now wire it into merge gates next to linters and test suites.

  • ◀︎
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 16
  • ▶︎

Most Popular

What X and Reddit Users Are Saying about Claude Opus 4.7

What X and Reddit Users Are Saying about Claude Opus 4.7

How power users on X and Reddit reacted to Claude Opus 4.7: praise for agentic coding, token burn concerns, and teams' practical prompting habits.

A glowing desktop graphics card streams data into a landscape painting on an easel beside VRAM and wattage gauges

Run FLUX 2 Locally in 2026: VRAM by GPU + ComfyUI Setup

Run FLUX 2 locally in ComfyUI. VRAM by GPU from 8GB to 24GB, GGUF builds, the variant that fits your card, cost versus cloud, and the files to grab.

Running Gemma 4 26B MoE on 8GB VRAM: Three Strategies That Work

Running Gemma 4 26B MoE on 8GB VRAM: Three Strategies That Work

Run Google Gemma 4 26B MoE with sparse activation on budget 8GB GPUs using aggressive quantization, GPU-CPU layer offloading, and tensor parallelism techniques.

Three roped climbers ascend a cliff whose contour lines form a topographic curve over stacked memory chips at the base.

Local Image Models in 2026: Qwen vs FLUX vs SDXL on VRAM

Compare the best local image generation models on text-in-image accuracy, prompt adherence, VRAM, speed, and license to find your quality-per-VRAM sweet spot.

AI Coding Benchmarks in 2026: Why the Leaderboard You Pick Decides the Winner

AI Coding Benchmarks in 2026: Why the Leaderboard You Pick Decides the Winner

AI coding benchmarks produce wildly different rankings. Which models win depends on which benchmark you choose and which agent framework wraps them.

RTX 5080 vs. RTX 5090: The Best GPU for Local AI Workloads in 2026

RTX 5080 vs. RTX 5090: The Best GPU for Local AI Workloads in 2026

Compare the RTX 5080 and 5090 for local AI in 2026: LLM inference benchmarks, image generation performance, power consumption, and a clear value verdict.

Like what you read?

Subscribe to the Botmonster newsletter and get Linux, AI, and self-hosting posts weekly.

Privacy Policy  ·  Terms of Service
2026 Botmonster