LogoBotmonster Tech
AI Smart Home Self-Hosting Coding Web Dev Hardware Bootpag Image2SVG Tags
Smart Pet Feeder for $20: Ditch $150 commercial feeders

Smart Pet Feeder for $20: Ditch $150 commercial feeders

Yes, you can build a smart pet feeder for under $25. It uses an ESP32, a continuous rotation servo, and a 3D-printed auger, driven by ESPHome and Home Assistant . You get scheduled meals, set portion sizes, a “feed now” button on your phone, and a full feeding log. Commercial feeders like PetSafe ($100 to $150) and PETLIBRO ($65 to $160) charge a premium for the same features. This guide covers the hardware, wiring, firmware, and safety steps that make the build reliable.

Build a Thread Device With ESPHome and the ESP32-H2

Build a Thread Device With ESPHome and the ESP32-H2

Thread is a low-power, IPv6-based mesh protocol for smart home devices. Since ESPHome 2025.6.0, you can flash Thread-native firmware onto any ESP32-H2 or ESP32-C6 board. No Zigbee2MQTT, no WiFi congestion. Grab an ESP32-H2-DevKitM-1, write a short ESPHome config with the esp-idf framework and the openthread component, then join it to a Thread border router like Home Assistant Yellow or a HomePod mini. Your sensors show up over IPv6 with sub-second latency and battery life measured in months.

Plant Monitor System ESP32: Under $10 Per Plant

Plant Monitor System ESP32: Under $10 Per Plant

Yes, you can monitor every houseplant in your home for under $10 per plant. A single ESP32 board running ESPHome (currently at version 2026.3.0) reads capacitive soil moisture sensors, a BH1750 light sensor, and an AHT20 temperature/humidity sensor, then feeds everything straight into Home Assistant . From there, automations send you a notification when a plant needs water, dashboards show moisture trends over weeks, and you stop guessing whether that fern in the corner is actually happy. This guide covers sensor selection, wiring a 4-plant monitoring hub, the complete ESPHome YAML configuration, Home Assistant dashboards, and tips for long-term reliability.

Automate Your Pool or Hot Tub with Home Assistant and ESPHome Sensors

Automate Your Pool or Hot Tub with Home Assistant and ESPHome Sensors

Pool and hot tub chemistry can swing from safe to damaging in a few hours. A paper strip you dip once a week will not catch it. The fix is cheap: a waterproof ESPHome sensor built around an ESP32 , reading water temperature, pH, and ORP, piped into Home Assistant for pump schedules, chemical alerts, and cover reminders. A full setup runs under $80. It replaces guesswork with a live dashboard and push alerts that fire before your heater corrodes.

Bluetooth Proxies Under $20: Room Detection with ESP32-C3

Bluetooth Proxies Under $20: Room Detection with ESP32-C3

Drop a few ESP32 boards ($3-8 each) flashed with ESPHome ’s Bluetooth Proxy firmware into rooms where BLE devices drop out. Home Assistant then routes Bluetooth traffic through the nearest proxy on its own. Each proxy adds about 10-15 meters of BLE coverage through interior walls, needs only a USB power cable, and works with HA’s native Bluetooth setup. The BLE devices themselves need no config changes. They have no idea they’re talking through a relay.

Shelly Relay Garage Automation: $20 Install, Zero Warranty Risk

Shelly Relay Garage Automation: $20 Install, Zero Warranty Risk

Wire a Shelly 1 relay in parallel with your existing garage door opener’s wall button, attach a reed switch for open/closed state detection, and integrate both with Home Assistant . That is the whole project. You get remote control, auto-close timers, arrival-based opening, and departure-based closing for under $20 in hardware, without replacing your existing opener or voiding any warranties.

This approach works because nearly every residential garage door opener - Chamberlain, LiftMaster, Genie, Craftsman - uses the same basic control mechanism. The wall button shorts two low-voltage wires together, and the motor responds. The Shelly relay replicates that button press electronically. Your physical wall button keeps working; the relay just adds a second way to trigger the same circuit.

  • ◀︎
  • 1
  • 2
  • ▶︎

Most Popular

Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3.5 vs Llama 4: Which Open Model Should You Actually Use? (2026)

Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3.5 vs Llama 4: Which Open Model Should You Actually Use? (2026)

Gemma 4, Qwen 3.5, and Llama 4 compared on benchmarks, licensing, speed, and hardware so you can pick the right open model fast.

5 Open Source Repos That Make Claude Code Unstoppable

5 Open Source Repos That Make Claude Code Unstoppable

Five March 2026 repos extend Claude Code with autonomous ML, self-healing skills, GUI automation, multi-agent coordination, and Google Workspace access.

Cross-section of a translucent crystal brain threaded by red, gold, and teal attention ribbons resting on a doubly-stochastic matrix pedestal beside a guitar-tuning lab figure.

DeepSeek V4 Tech Report: 3 Tricks That Cut Compute 73%

DeepSeek V4 ships 1.6T parameters and 1M context using only 27% of V3.2's inference FLOPs. Inside the hybrid attention, mHC residuals, and Muon optimizer.

Cracked stone tablet engraved with a bulleted system prompt, four crossed-out goblin silhouettes repeated, a tiny goblin escaping with upvote-arrow sparks, a giant dollar-sign price tag, and figures refusing to step onto a glossier pedestal.

GPT 5.5 Reddit Reception: Goblins and the Cost Backlash

GPT-5.5 Reddit reception: viral goblin prompt leak, doubled pricing backlash, and 5.4 holdouts citing hallucination regressions in factual recall workflows.

What X and Reddit Users Are Saying about Claude Opus 4.7

What X and Reddit Users Are Saying about Claude Opus 4.7

How power users on X and Reddit reacted to Claude Opus 4.7: praise for agentic coding, token burn concerns, and teams' practical prompting habits.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Alibaba's Open-Weight Coding MoE

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Alibaba's Open-Weight Coding MoE

Alibaba's sparse Mixture-of-Experts: 35B total parameters, 3B active per token. Q4 quantization runs on MacBook Pro M5, matches Claude Sonnet performance.

Alacritty vs. Kitty: Best High-Performance Linux Terminal

Alacritty vs. Kitty: Best High-Performance Linux Terminal

Compare Alacritty and Kitty terminal emulators: performance benchmarks, latency, memory use, startup time, and which fits your Linux workflow best.

Like what you read?

Get new posts on Linux, AI, and self-hosting delivered to your inbox weekly.

Privacy Policy  ·  Terms of Service
2026 Botmonster